Sprott Money Contact Form
 

Thank you for contacting Sprott Money.  We will respond to you within 1 business day.

 

Sincerely,


The Sprott Money Team


Sprott Money Ltd.
111 Queen St. East
Suite 501
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1S2
Canada

[t] 1.888.861.0775
[f] 416.861.9855
sales@sprottmoney.com
www.sprottmoney.com

Administrative office only - no walk-in sales.

 

Please Try Again After Some Time...
Please enter valid captcha
Name*
Email*
Comments*
Loading Image

Toll Free: 1-888-861-0775; Local: 416-861-0775

Swipe to the left

The Bankers' Manifesto of 1892 - Jeff Nielson

By Jeff Nielson 3 years ago 36504 Views 2 comments

September 5, 2014

Charles Lindbergh Sr. (1859–1924) was a distinguished U.S. politician. In our (dubious) “history books”, however, it is the exploits of his son, Charles Lindbergh Jr. (the famed “aviator”) which are remembered. A closer scrutiny of the career of the father leaves little doubt who was the real “hero” in this family.

Lindbergh Sr. served as a Congressman in the Republican Party from 1907 -1917. During that time; he was one of the most vehement and outspoken members of the U.S. government against the creation of the Federal Reserve, and the rapidly growing influence/power of the Old World Order banking cabal whom we know today as the One Bank. Indeed, as detailed in the superb documentary, The Money Masters, Lindbergh Sr. may have been the most-strident opponent of this banking cabal in that era whom did not succumb to an assassin’s bullet.

Charles_August_Lindbergh Sr.

Lindbergh quit the Republican Party in 1916, having reached the conclusion (98 years ago) that both U.S. political parties were already irredeemably corrupt, and under the control of:

“…a sinister influence…which, if it is not checked, intends to completely undermine the original purpose of the formation of our Government – change it from the purposes of democracy, and instead make it of a monarchical and plutocratic system, and to bring all the world into one control and one system, which for purposes of deception of the plain people, they would call a “world’s democracy,” but which in fact it is their plan to make the rule of the wealth grabbers, maintained by simple organization of themselves and disorganization of the masses pitting the masses against each other.

Though somewhat longwinded; in that one statement Charles Lindbergh Sr. identifies two of the most-dominant truths in our own societies of the 21st century. First he identifies who is this “sinister influence” which seeks to “bring all the world into one control and one system”. It is “the wealth grabbers” (which he would later call “the Money Trust”). We identify them today simply as “bankers”, along with the tiny cabal of ultra-wealthy Oligarchs hiding in the shadows and pulling their strings – aka “the One Bank”.

Lindbergh also describes a century ago the precise propaganda paradigm which these “wealth grabbers” intended to create as a front for their systematic looting of our societies. While (nearly) all have forgotten the name “Charles Lindbergh Sr.”; we’re all familiar – Sheep and non-Sheep alike – with the mythology he predicted one hundred years ago: the so-called “New World Order”.

How did Lindbergh know? How could anyone “predict” the relentless consolidation of wealth/power which we have seen from this banking cabal over the last century, and precisely describe how they intended to pursue their (evil) objectives? While it is impossible to see into the mind of this (deceased) political hero a hundred years later, and thus be in possession of all that Lindbergh had learned; we do have one, very large clue as to how/where Lindbergh Sr. came by his knowledge: from the bankers, themselves.

At some time during Lindbergh’s years in the U.S. Congress, he is purported to have presented the document below openly in Congress, a document which Lindbergh titled “The Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892”. More than 120 years later, all (original) traces of this document have been wiped-clean from the internet, but (for the inquisitive) it may still be possible to verify the legitimacy of it through research at a large public or university library.

For many, however, such verification will be seen as redundant. This is simply because The Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892 describes – in even greater detail than the previous Lindbergh quote – precisely what we have seen unfold over the past century since Lindbergh (purportedly) brought this document before the U.S. Congress.

Because it is not overly long; it is reproduced in full. For any readers who still remain skeptical as they begin reading through this; ask yourselves one question. If this document is not bonafide; how could one (now-forgotten) U.S. politician have “predicted” events over the next one hundred years with a level of detail/precision not even matched by Nostradamus, himself?

The Bankers’ Manifesto of 1892

We must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor Organizations in the United States should be watched carefully by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis.

Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation. The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible.

When through the process of law, the common people have lost their homes [i.e. the growing millions of “homeless people” in our societies today] they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles [i.e. there is no “New Normal”]. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaging in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.


The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization of the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party.

By thus dividing the voters, we can get them to expend their energies fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished.

Mai Zimbleman 2 years ago at 2:26 AM
Great article. Today I found this one..
Ike’s Not So Famous Second Warning :Ike’s second warning, hint: it is not the “military-industrial complex”
"There are only two warnings in that speech for God’s sake, if you’re going to honor a historical document maybe somebody could at least read it, and maybe for once in almost fifty years remind us of Ike’s second warning: “…that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.” Does anything come immediately to mind when you read that? Ike goes on, “…Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity.” And, “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present – and is gravely to be regarded.”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/02/21/ikes-second-warning-hint-it-is-not-the-military-industrial-complex/
Gary Gevisser 1 years ago at 12:30 AM
This document was most likely a forgery, which in fact makes it that much more significant given how well written it was.

The fact that the authors are so vague "he is purported to have presented the document below openly in Congress.." is intended to give "conspiracy theorists" and their opposition, both making a living in the distraction game, a field day.

All that is important are the words. They are pure genius and do in fact explain everything that was going on then and since, better than most could imagine.

So this whole Lindberg thing was a ruse.

Now you should be asking me, how come I know so much?

[Word count 111]

Back to top