Sprott Money Contact Form
 

Thank you for contacting Sprott Money.  We will respond to you within 1 business day.

 

Sincerely,


The Sprott Money Team


Sprott Money Ltd.
111 Queen St. East
Suite 501
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1S2
Canada

[t] 1.888.861.0775
[f] 416.861.9855
sales@sprottmoney.com
www.sprottmoney.com

Administrative office only - no walk-in sales.

 

Please Try Again After Some Time...
Please enter valid captcha
Name*
Email*
Comments*
Loading Image

Toll Free: 1-888-861-0775; Local: 416-861-0775

Swipe to the left

The March to World War III - Jeff Nielson

The March to World War III - Jeff Nielson
By Jeff Nielson 2 years ago 14207 Views 16 comments

October 13, 2016

The Next Crash is coming. Equity markets (especially U.S. markets) have been pumped up to bubble levels. Bond markets (especially the U.S. bond market) have been pumped up to absurd, bubble levels – and it isn’t even supposed to be possible to have a stock bubble and a bond bubble simultaneously. It is yet another symptom of the hyperinflationary insanity and monetary criminality of the grossly excessive currency-creation by Western central banks.

Equally, real estate markets across the entire Western world are at near all-time bubble highs. There is no more profit to be made by the banking crime syndicate continuing to inflate the bubbles to more absurd proportions, or simply maintaining valuations at present levels. A reset is required, so that the One Bank can then begin its next bubble-and-crash cycle.

Because of this reality, readers were previously presented with the pattern we have seen with the last, two bubble-and-crash cycles. They were approximately 8 years long, and the “crash” was triggered near the end of the U.S. political cycle: in the late stages of an incumbent regime, responsible for nearly the entire length of the cycle. The outgoing regime was fingered as the scapegoat for the crash, so that the Big Banks and central banks did not attract such criticism to themselves, while the incoming regime was hailed as a White Knight, riding to the rescue.

The crime syndicate itself must always appear blameless in these bubble-and-crash cycles, or it would be subjected to much greater scrutiny in future business cycles. Indeed, the entire concept of a “business cycle” is more propaganda fantasy from the Corporate media (and its banker overlords). There is nothing at all normal about our economies racing along in a permanent economic roller-coaster ride, surging to a peak one year, plunging to a trough in a subsequent year.

When our economies had honest money, when the gold standard prevented the excessive creation of banker currency, and prevented excessive indebtedness by our governments, we did not have regular economic peaks and valleys. Nations could go decades between any serious downturn in the economy, while economic growth was at a low, but stable/sustainable rate.

When crashes did occur, they were invariably the creation of the Big Banks themselves (and their oligarch masters). The Big Banks would, simultaneously, cut off all new credit, while calling in as many loans as possible, in order to create a sharp contraction in the amount of capital available to fuel these capitalist economies. Deprive a capitalist economy of capital, and you create a recession, or (if taken to a great enough extreme) a depression.

So-called “business cycles” are nothing but crime cycles, the bubble-and-crash crimes of the One Bank. Yet it has now (deliberately) refused to detonate these bubbles in line with its recent pattern. It has now passed any convenient window for an economic-based detonation of our markets/economies.

With the U.S. election now weeks away, any economic and market crash would attract blame to both the incoming and outgoing regime. If a Republican was elected, it would further tarnish the image of both parties in the eyes of the Zombie Electorate. If a Democrat was elected, it would attract extreme anger among the electorate toward the Democrats, as they would represent both the incoming and outgoing government – 100% responsible for any economic-based crash. Both of those scenarios lead to the worst nightmare of the banking crime syndicate: the possible rise of an independent and popular Third Party in the U.S. political landscape.

It now appears apparent that the trigger for the Next Crash will not be economic in nature and, instead, we move to the next most-likely scenario: a geopolitical trigger for this economic reset. There are two reasons for drawing this conclusion. First of all, as was apparent in the most-recent U.S. political debate, the Corporate media has now openly sided with Hillary Clinton.

Some of Donald Trump’s past reprehensible behavior was trotted out, and transformed (via media hype) into a scandal. Simultaneously, the crimes which Hillary Clinton is known to have committed in her dubious political career are being downplayed. The moderator in the latest pseudo-debate was openly and obviously confrontational toward Trump, beyond any pretense of neutrality .

In this contest between a boorish, bigoted oaf like Trump, and a power-hungry, law-breaking schemer like Clinton, there is no lesser of evils . The only voting option which should not be totally repugnant to voters is to cast their vote for some Third Party choice, or simply to abstain. Imagine if the oligarchs staged one of their crooked elections, and no one showed up!

Instead, barring some unpredictable reversing of the political pendulum, the oligarchs have made their choice: Queen Hillary. And this takes us back to the Next Crash, and the second reason why the One Bank will apparently choose a geopolitical trigger. How do the banksters prevent a three-term Democrat government from becoming totally despised by U.S. voters (even more than the Republicans)?

Though the oligarchs control both parties, it is crucial to them that both parties remain in existence as credible choices, so that the United States can still pretend to be “a democracy”. This Next Crash must and will be a more economically devastating event than any previous downturn in our lifetime, because our economies have already been hollowed-out to the verge of implosion.

Being the political scapegoat for such an event would completely destroy the Democrat party, or at least banish it from power for decades. With then only one choice, voters would soon become equally disgusted with the Republicans, as they would become 100% responsible for all future economic deterioration.

For these reasons, it is important that Queen Clinton and the rest of her regime have an external Boogeyman who can/will be blamed as the source of the Next Crash. While it is still possible that this triggering event could be another “terrorist” false-flag event of great magnitude, one has to doubt that the oligarchs would have the audacity to attempt to perpetrate a second “9/11”.

Enter Russia. For three years; the U.S. government and Corporate media have engaged in a relentless campaign of demonizing Russia, all at the request of the banker overlords. Read the idiotic drivel churned out by the propaganda machine, and one would believe that Russia was/is at the root of almost all global evils. The perverse irony is, of course, that it is the One Bank itself which is at the root of almost all global evils.

The anti-Russia propaganda is only exceeded in its quantity by its absurdity. The various facets of this anti-Russia propaganda have been documented (and dismissed) in an equally relentless manner by the superb insights of Paul Craig Roberts, most recently a week ago . These political attacks against Russia came immediately after the U.S. government (and the bankers themselves) engaged in an all-out effort to attempt to destroy Russia’s economy .

They failed, so Plan B appears to be to make Russia the scapegoat for the Next War, as the official cause of the Next Crash. Of course starting a war isn’t being planned by the banksters solely to provide political cover for their Democrat and/or Republican lackeys. War is also very good for business, and a world war is even better for business. That’s why they have staged two world wars, in a span of just over a century.

Current sabre-rattling by the psychopathic Neo-cons is more extreme than anything seen in our lifetime, even more extreme than the fraudulent demonizing of Iraq, which led to the U.S.’s fraudulent invasion of Iraq. The latest nonsense is accusations of cyber-terrorism against Russia.

  1. It’s impossible to ever prove that a cyber-attack against the U.S. government actually took place, thus equally, it is impossible for any accusation target to prove that it wasn’t responsible (for an “attack” which probably never even took place).
  2. The world’s only cyber-terrorists are the Thugs of the U.S. government.

Over the last three years; the U.S. government and the pathetic parrots of the mainstream media have accused Russia of any and every transgression possible, save for (perhaps) kicking puppies or molesting children. One must strongly suspect that all these lies and innuendo had (and have) a purpose. And the most likely purpose – by far – is the orchestration of World War III.


Jeff Nielson is co-founder and managing partner of Bullion Bulls Canada; a website which provides precious metals commentary, economic analysis, and mining information to readers and investors. Jeff originally came to the precious metals sector as an investor around the middle of last decade, but with a background in economics and law, he soon decided this was where he wanted to make the focus of his career. His website is www.bullionbullscanada.com.


The views and opinions expressed in this material are those of the author as of the publication date, are subject to change and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sprott Money Ltd. Sprott Money does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness and reliability of the information or any results from its use.

Steph 2 years ago at 11:55 AM
Canada is in the worst location if there ever is a direct war with USA and Russia. I think all the people of Canada, who have spare time, should dig around our country and re-position it close to Australia. Hopefully Russia is aware that opinions heard thru the propaganda machine ''mainstream media'', does not reflect the majority of people and to remember that there is lots of good people here in Canada who do not believe war is the answer.
Jeff Nielson 2 years ago at 1:28 PM
Yes Steph, I fully agree that most of the PEOPLE in Canada (and the U.S.) have no desire for war with Russia -- or anyone else. Sadly, I don't think that those sentiments will carry much weight if (when) the U.S. initiates war with Russia.
Claude Taillefer 2 years ago at 6:57 AM
The rest of the planet is tired of the "evil empire" The US can't go to war with Russia without NATO and this war would quickly expand on three theatres with Russia and China and Iran taking the opportunity to split the US forces.

Reality is the US can keep printing funny money indefinitely and the proof is that in spite of printing as much as they can the US currency has not fallen against others, if anything it has gained against the rest !

The strategy is clear to keep printing until inflation catches up, could be decades IMO.

There is no historical precedent for this... We are in unknown territory.
Jeff Nielson 2 years ago at 3:31 PM
Claude, I would dispute this comment:

"Reality is the US can keep printing funny money indefinitely and the proof is that in spite of printing as much as they can the US currency has not fallen against others, if anything it has gained against the rest !"

1) The USD is the most-manipulated currency in the history of human commerce. All market manipulation fails over the long term.

2) More generally, it's the old joke about the man who jumps off a 100-storey building...

"...as the man sails past an open window on the 50th floor, he's heard exclaiming, 'So far, so good.'"
John Doe 2 years ago at 5:34 PM
Well, our liberal media in Canada has been tripping over itself telling everyone who will listen that all Canadians dislike Donald Trump, an obvious despicable lie! It's nauseating how these presstitutes pick up the BS narrative from the US MSM about Big Bad Donald Trump. The breathtaking bias these days in the media is absolutely astonishing.
Putin is no idiot so he knows the score, he also knows what nuclear war would mean for this world.....
Steve Smith 2 years ago at 6:24 PM
Agreed, Canada would find itself in a bad way if nuclear war ever broke out. I'm Canadian, and I've heard many fellow Canadians say, "Nah, we'll never get nuked, we have no nukes and our military is too small to threaten anyone."

However, here are some facts that should dispel anyone of this illusion.

1. Canada is an ally of the US. Under various treaties and under Canada's obligations to NATO, Canada is obligated to render all possible assistance to the US.

2. Most Canadian cities and towns are located within a two-hour drive of the US border, at most. Most of Canada's major military bases are located not too far from these urban centres. The proximity of these bases to the US means they would be readily accessible to US air and ground assets that would want to harbour in these bases or operate from them to prosecute any war. As a result, these bases would indeed be targets for enemy nuclear weapons.

3. Several Canadian cities have defence plants - i.e. the Colt Canada plant in Kitchener, Ontario manufactures a M16A4 clone known as the C7 rifle in Canadian service. The GDLS plant in nearby London makes wheeled armoured fighting vehicles, and could probably produce tanks, or major components of same if a major war broke out.
Sarnia, Ontario is home to a major petrochemical complex that refines oil into gasoline, and also produces synthetic rubber and related components. All of these things are used in armaments production.
Because of their capabilities, all of of these cities are potential nuclear targets.

Even if Canada wasn't hit with nuclear weapons, parts of the country (i.e. southern Ontario) would receive large amounts of radioactive fallout from US targets.

The only way Canada could avoid being directly affected is if a limited nuclear attack takes place, where only a few targets are hit in an effort to make an enemy sue for peace on the attacker's terms. In a limited attack scenario, it's likely that only a few major US cities and major bases would be hit.

However, I think it's far more likely that a full-scale nuclear war would break out as all sides with nuclear weapons would adopt a use-them-or-lose them philosophy to avoid losing major chunks of their nuclear arsenals.
Jeff Nielson 2 years ago at 3:32 PM
Yes, Steve, it may be time to have the children practicing their "duck and cover" drills (lol), as these Western psychopaths could easily ACCIDENTALLY trigger a nuclear holocaust.
Ian 2 years ago at 3:04 PM
Even here in New Zealand, the main stream media endlessly vomit up the same anti Trump, anti Putin propaganga. Recently here, a talk back radio host claimed to be shocked that there could be so much support for Trump amongst his listeners after he had disparaged him. The puppets within the MSM all over the world have blood on their hands. Thanks Jeff for daring to tell it like it is.
Tom Kauser 2 years ago at 2:51 AM
You can have him just watch your goats and hide your fav.
T.J. Thomas 2 years ago at 5:17 PM
"If a Republican was elected, it would further tarnish the image of both parties in the eyes of the Zombie Electorate."

This is exactly why I think that Trump becoming president would be the worst thing that could happen to Republicans in the long run.

I think a major crash is on its way regardless. And with Republicans spending the last 8 years saying that a president can't blame his predecessor for a bad economy, a major crash under President Trump with a Republican Congress would likely send Congress and the White House back to the Democrats. Whereas a major crash under President Clinton would likely keep Congress locked in by Republicans for years to come.
Tom Kauser 2 years ago at 2:49 AM
Almost ten years and yet tomorrow will bring another round of bond porn?
I am amazed that this same equity/bond Bubble can't happen talk is an insult and really its equities that are mis- priced?
No one believed the 30+ year bond rally and its been on its last days for decades!
You get that fed to start selling its portfolio instead of buying everything available and then we talk?
Jeff Nielson 2 years ago at 3:35 PM
No, Tom, Western bonds are the most over-priced asset class in the history of humanity.

Most Western bonds are WORTHLESS, as they are issued by bankrupt governments. The "best" Western bonds (i.e. least worthless) would fetch pennies on the dollar -- yet these bonds are priced at their highest prices in history. Compared to bond prices, equity prices are fair and rational.
Charles Peden 2 years ago at 7:24 AM
Dear Jeff:

I think that you are being overly optimistic. The coming war and collapse will be total resulting in the death of the U.S. nation state and a depopulation event in order to usher in global technocracy and one world governance. Who needs parties?
Brian 2 years ago at 11:33 AM
One has to suppose that the destruction of the USA is part of the plan. Nothing the elitist scum do makes sense any other way. It all falls into place when viewed from that angle. Nation states must go. They have spent a long time making the USA into a villain. They won't waste it now. They'll have us paying "reparations" to their bureaucrats for the evils they planned by themselves in our name. Bet on it!
Jeff Nielson 2 years ago at 3:37 PM
I agree Brian, but with the caveat that I can't construe any RATIONAL plan where it is in the best interests of the oligarchs to cannibalize their own power base.
Pete Gawtry 2 years ago at 4:03 PM
Here we go.. this is the big one
BitcoinCash

Back to top