Sprott Money Contact Form
 

Thank you for contacting Sprott Money.  We will respond to you within 1 business day.

 

Sincerely,


The Sprott Money Team


Sprott Money Ltd.
111 Queen St. East
Suite 501
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1S2
Canada

[t] 1.888.861.0775
[f] 416.861.9855
sales@sprottmoney.com
www.sprottmoney.com

Administrative office only - no walk-in sales.

 

Please Try Again After Some Time...
Please enter valid captcha
Name*
Email*
Comments*
Loading Image

Toll Free: 1-888-861-0775; Local: 416-861-0775

Swipe to the left

Gold Undervalued Due To Massive Stock Dilution & Debt - Steve St. Angelo

Gold Undervalued Due To Massive Stock Dilution & Debt - Steve St. Angelo
By Steve St. Angelo - SRSRoccoReport.com 3 years ago 2806 Views 1 comment

Independent researcher Steve St. Angelo (SRSrocco) started to invest in precious metals in 2002. Later on in 2008, he began researching areas of the gold and silver market that, curiously, the majority of the precious metal analyst community have left unexplored. These areas include how energy and the falling EROI – Energy Returned On Invested – stand to impact the mining industry, precious metals, paper assets, and the overall economy.

You can find many of Steve’s articles on many noteworthy sites. Visit Steve at https://srsroccoreport.com.



January 7, 2016

The market price of gold would be considerably higher if it wasn’t for the massive stock dilution and debt in the gold mining industry. Basically, the gold mining industry issued billions of new shares and debt to help replace production and to compensate for rising costs. Thus, investors of gold mining stocks got ripped off so the market could enjoy an artificially lower gold price.

Nothing like Free Market Capitalism at work.

Top 5 Gold Producers: Production vs Shares

If we look at the data from the top five gold producers since 2000, we can see a very interesting trend. In 2000, these top gold producers (Barrick, Newmont, AngloGold, GoldFields & GoldCorp) had 1.39 billion shares outstanding, while their total production was 23.6 million ounces (Moz).

Top-5-Gold-Production-vs-Total-Outstanding-Shares

Now compare that to year ending 2014, where combined production for the group declined to 20.9 Moz while total outstanding shares increased to a staggering 3.65 billion (shown in the chart as 3,652 million shares). Since 2000, these top five gold companies increased their shares total shares by 2.2 billion while total production declined by 2.7 Moz.

This next chart shows the increase of outstanding shares for each gold mining company:

Top-5-YCharts-Change-Oustanding-Shares

(GG: GoldCorp, GFI: GoldFields, ABX: Barrick, NEM: Newmont, AU: AngloGold)

Here is a breakdown for the increase in shares for each since 2000:

Barrick = +769 million shares

GoldCorp = +657 million shares

GoldFields = +332 million shares

Newmont = +332 million shares

AngloGold = +191 million shares

What has taken place in the top gold mining industry is simple… profits alone could not fund new projects (replacement production) or increased costs, so the industry raped shareholder value. Here’s another way to look at this wonderful phenomenon.

If we compare total annual gold production versus outstanding shares, this is the result:

Top-5-Gold-Production-vs-Shares-Per-Gold-Oz

In 2000, these top five gold companies averaged 59.2 shares for each ounce of gold produced. However, in 2014 this increased nearly three times to 174.7 shares per gold ounce produced. Which means, stock investors got hoodwinked into financing the gold mining industry as profits alone were unable to do so.

And if you think that is bad…. it get’s even worse.

Top Gold Companies Increased Debt To Fund Production

Not only did these gold mining companies issue a lot more shares to fund their operations…. they also added a lot of debt:

Top-5-Gold-Producers-Increase-In-Total-Liabilities

As we can see in the chart above, total debt (liabilities) for these top gold companies was $7.2 billion in 2000 compared to a staggering $58.5 billion in 2014. If we apply simple math we have the following…..

Top 5 Gold Companies Debt per oz of gold produced:

2000 = $305 debt/ gold oz produced

2014 = $2,800 debt/ gold oz produced

What a change…. aye? These top gold producers held just $305 in debt for each ounce of gold they produced in 2000, however this skyrocketed to $2,800 of debt per ounce in 2014. That’s a lot of debt.

Imagine what the real cost to produce gold if these top mining companies did not issue 2.2 billion more shares or increase their debt more than eight times over the same time period. Thus, the market price of gold is artificially lower due to massive share dilution and colossal debt.

Investors purchasing gold (and silver) will be handsomely rewarded when the public finally realizes that they are holding onto DEBTS masquerading as ASSETS. This is when the true store of wealth value of gold and silver are realized.



The author is not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by Sprott Money Ltd. The views and opinions expressed in this material are those of the author or guest speaker, are subject to change and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Sprott Money Ltd. Sprott Money does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness and reliability of the information or any results from its use.

Christian Leonce Simon 3 years ago at 8:09 PM
Excellent article.
Well,situation could be worse when in the end probable reserves stealthly turn phantomatic.
Not to mention proven ones.
BitcoinCash

Back to top